Advertisement

Opinion | Can Belt and Road Initiative bridge the peace gap between China and Asean?

  • Connectivity between China and Asean could be enhanced through Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative
  • Massive infrastructure project comes against the background of Beijing’s military actions in South China Sea, and the US-China rivalry

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
9
Insight. A bridge to peace.

Photo: Craig Stephens
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) aims to create land and sea connectivity via a global web of infrastructure projects that will facilitate the flow of people and goods. This vision of connectivity is shared by the Association of Southeast Asian Nation (Asean) states. It did not come from China alone.
Advertisement

Asean countries themselves have ideas about connectivity. For instance, the idea of a pan-Asia railway did not originate from China but from Malaysia and Asean itself. Asean also has a master plan on Asean Connectivity 2025.

The BRI was launched at a time when long-standing regional aspirations for connectivity converged with China’s desire to play a larger role on the international stage facilitated by its expanded financial and technological capacity.

This happy convergence of aspirations and interests does not however guarantee the BRI would ensure peace between China and the Asean states. Almost nine years after the launch of the BRI, relations between China and Asean, while largely stable, have not markedly improved. Rather, suspicions of China have grown as its foreign policy under Xi Jinping took on a more nationalistic and confrontational posture.

The South China Sea dispute looms large in China-Asean relations as China’s display of military muscle and its establishment of outposts on artificial islands increase the threat perceptions of Southeast Asian claimant states. While Beijing would prefer to keep its territorial disputes separate from its overall ties with Asean countries, in the eyes of Asean states, Beijing’s economic might is linked to its military might.

As a result of China’s more strident foreign policy, suspicions of China’s intentions and the political and economic leverage it could exert through the BRI have increased. An annual survey by the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute showed that trust in China among Southeast Asian countries has fallen over the years.

Advertisement

Moreover, while infrastructure could be a boon to developing countries, it could also be a source of dependency. Infrastructure is a source of power, both in material and non-material terms. Materially, infrastructure, such as roads and railways, plays a significant role in power projection and war-making.

Advertisement